Last mentioned: 2h ago
Legal Challenges Mount
Retail coalitions and trade groups file lawsuits challenging the legality of the duties.
Appellate Review
Lower courts split on the issue, sending the case to the Supreme Court.
Tariff Implementation
15% across-the-board tariffs scheduled to take effect for 150 days.
Negotiations Deferred
India and US officially reschedule the Feb 23 chief negotiator meeting to evaluate legal impacts.
Trump Retaliation
President Trump announces 10% global tariffs, later increased to 15%.
SCOTUS Ruling
US Supreme Court strikes down presidential tariff authority, citing Congressional power.
Framework Reached
India and US announce a framework for an interim trade agreement.
Anticipated Legislative Review
Congress is expected to begin reviewing existing tariff structures to align with the new judicial precedent.
The 2026 Crunch
Inventory cushions are depleted, and the full cost of tariffs hits retail earnings, raising crash fears.
150-Day Expiration
The initial legal window for the Section 122 surcharge expires, requiring renewal or new authority.
Expiration Deadline
Section 122 tariffs expire unless Congress grants formal approval for extension.
Tariff Expiration Date
The 150-day window for Section 122 tariffs expires unless Congress intervenes.
Tariff Expiration
Scheduled end of the 150-day emergency tariff period unless extended or challenged.
Projected Deadline
Final window for many retrospective refund claims on 2024 imports.
Refund Window Opens
Expected date for the first wave of administrative protests and refund filings by U.S. importers.
Expected Implementation
Anticipated date for the start of tariff collection at US ports of entry.
Refund Litigation Begins
The Trump administration signals intent to litigate the refund process despite the ruling.
CBP Enforcement Halt
Expected deadline for U.S. Customs to cease all IEEPA-based duty collections.
Expected Policy Shift
Anticipated date for the rollout of new executive orders targeting the de minimis loophole.
Geneva Summit
Scheduled meeting between Iranian officials and U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff.
The US Supreme Court's decision to strike down President Trump's emergency tariffs has sparked a massive shift in global trade dynamics, with China and India positioned as the primary beneficiaries. This ruling effectively dismantles the 'emergency levy' framework, restoring previous trade terms and providing immediate relief to international supply chains.
Negotiations for a landmark interim trade deal between India and the United States have been abruptly postponed following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that limits presidential tariff authority. The delay comes as President Trump counters the court with a 15% across-the-board tariff, creating significant uncertainty for retail supply chains and cross-border e-commerce.
The U.S. Supreme Court has invalidated the administration's use of emergency powers to impose tariffs, prompting President Trump to announce a replacement 15% global tariff. Meanwhile, high-stakes diplomatic talks with Iran are scheduled for Geneva this Thursday amid a massive U.S. military buildup in the Middle East.
Following a Supreme Court ruling against his trade policy, President Trump has implemented a 15% global import duty, prompting the EU to demand adherence to prior trade agreements. The move has injected fresh volatility into transatlantic relations and threatens to stall major trade legislation in the European Parliament.
Following a Supreme Court ruling that invalidated previous trade levies, President Trump has announced a new 15% global tariff under the 1974 Trade Act. The move creates immediate supply chain volatility and potential for $130 billion in corporate tax refunds.
The US Supreme Court's ruling against the Trump administration's unilateral tariff authority has created a legal vacuum, but USTR Jamieson Greer confirms that existing bilateral trade agreements remain legally binding. This development signals a shift from executive-led trade mandates to a more negotiated, treaty-based approach for e-commerce and retail supply chains.
President Donald Trump is leveraging alternative executive authorities to maintain aggressive tariff policies despite a recent Supreme Court ruling aimed at curbing his trade powers. This persistent protectionist stance is forcing e-commerce and retail leaders to navigate a volatile regulatory environment where judicial intervention has yet to provide expected relief.
The Australian government is exploring all strategic options, including potential retaliatory measures, following President Donald Trump's imposition of a 15% blanket tariff on foreign imports. The move threatens to disrupt long-standing trade agreements and significantly increase costs for cross-border e-commerce and retail supply chains.
A significant judicial ruling striking down specific tariff measures against Chinese imports has introduced a new wave of volatility into US-China trade relations. For the e-commerce and retail sectors, the decision complicates long-term supply chain planning and pricing strategies during a critical fiscal period.
New tariff proposals from Donald Trump signal a potential shift in US trade policy that could strip Australian exporters of their competitive edge. The move threatens to disrupt established trade flows and increase costs for US retailers relying on Australian consumer goods and raw materials.
President Trump has unilaterally raised the global import duty to 15% just one day after the Supreme Court struck down his previous tariff framework. This move signals a significant escalation in trade volatility, forcing the e-commerce and retail sectors to brace for immediate supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures.
President Trump has escalated a proposed global tariff from 10% to 15% using Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act. The move follows a Supreme Court ruling that blocked his previous use of emergency powers for trade duties.
The U.S. Supreme Court has invalidated the Trump administration's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad tariffs. In an immediate response to the judicial setback, the administration has signed a new 10% global tariff, signaling a volatile period for e-commerce supply chains.
President Donald Trump has officially raised the United States' global tariff rate to 15%, establishing a universal baseline for all imported goods. This sweeping protectionist measure is set to fundamentally restructure retail supply chains and consumer pricing models across the country.
President Trump has announced an immediate increase in global tariffs from 10% to 15%, signaling a sharp escalation in protectionist trade policy. The move forces retailers to confront sudden cost increases across all imported goods, with further regulatory adjustments expected in the coming months.
Following a judicial setback regarding executive trade authority, President Trump has initiated aggressive countermoves to maintain high import duties. The resulting legal and regulatory uncertainty is forcing e-commerce and retail giants to urgently recalibrate their 2026 sourcing and pricing strategies.
Following a 6-3 Supreme Court ruling declaring his 'reciprocal tariffs' illegal, President Trump asserted that trade relations with India remain unchanged. Despite the legal setback regarding executive authority, the administration plans to pursue alternative routes to maintain its protectionist trade framework.
President Donald Trump has signed an executive order mandating a 10% tariff on all imported goods from every country, a move that follows a significant legal setback in federal court. This escalation of protectionist trade policy is expected to disrupt global supply chains and significantly increase costs for U.S. retailers and e-commerce platforms.
The US Supreme Court's rejection of emergency 'reciprocal' tariffs has triggered an immediate pivot by the Trump administration to a 10% global tariff under the 1974 Trade Act. This legal volatility is creating significant uncertainty for South Korean exporters and retail supply chains.
The US Supreme Court has ruled 6-3 against President Trump’s sweeping reciprocal tariffs, citing a lack of congressional authority. While the decision sparked a record-breaking rally for the Stoxx 600, Trump has already retaliated by announcing a new 10% global tariff under Section 122.