Retail entity

International Emergency Economic Powers Act

Technology

Every one of those 5 sits in a single category, market-trends. Donald Trump is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 5 of the 5 tracked stories. That works out to roughly 2.5 stories per week across a 14-day span. The busiest single day carried 3.

Last mentioned: Mar 13, 2026

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · International Emergency Economic Powers Act

5 stories
7.6 avg impact
0% positive
60% negative

Coverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 60 percentage points.

  • 40% neutral
  • 60% negative

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about International Emergency Economic Powers Act

Every one of those 5 sits in a single category, market-trends. Donald Trump is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 5 of the 5 tracked stories. That works out to roughly 2.5 stories per week across a 14-day span. The busiest single day carried 3. Against the same-window beat baseline of 34% negative, this entity's 60% share is more negative. The 7.6 average consequence score is above the beat benchmark of 6.4 in the same window. They are less corroborated than the beat average, carrying 2 original sources each against 3.5 for the same window. We currently track 5 Retail stories that mention International Emergency Economic Powers Act, published between February 20, 2026 and March 5, 2026.

Stories tracked
5
Per week
2.5
Negative
60%
Sources per story
2

Computed from the 5 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 277 Retail stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Timeline

  1. 150-Day Expiration

    The initial legal window for the Section 122 surcharge expires, requiring renewal or new authority.

  2. CIT Refund Order

    Court of International Trade orders CBP to begin automatic refunds of IEEPA duties.

  3. Refund Litigation Begins

    The Trump administration signals intent to litigate the refund process despite the ruling.

  4. Tariffs Effective

    The new 10% global tariff takes effect for all imports.

  5. Market Reaction

    Retailers and e-commerce firms assess the impact of potential refunds vs. new duties.

  6. SCOTUS Ruling Issued

    Supreme Court declares IEEPA tariffs unlawful and unconstitutional in a 6-3 vote.

  7. New Tariff Announcement

    White House announces a new 10% worldwide tariff within hours of the ruling.

  8. Supreme Court Ruling

    SC rules 6-3 against the administration's use of IEEPA for broad import tariffs.

  9. Executive Order Signed

    Trump invokes Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a 10% global tariff.

  10. Section 122 Pivot

    Administration issues a 10% across-the-board tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.

  11. SCOTUS Ruling

    The U.S. Supreme Court strikes down the IEEPA tariffs as an overreach of executive power.

  12. Liberation Day

    President Trump imposes sweeping global tariffs using IEEPA authority.

  13. IEEPA Tariffs Imposed

    President Trump implements reciprocal and drug-trafficking tariffs via executive order.

  14. IEEPA Tariffs Imposed

    President Trump levies broad tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Stories mentioning International Emergency Economic Powers Act 5

Market Trends Neutral

CIT Orders Automatic Refunds for IEEPA Tariffs Amid Legal Shifts

The Court of International Trade has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to automatically refund duties collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. While the ruling provides a potential liquidity boost for retailers, ongoing legal appeals and the shift to Section 122 tariffs maintain a complex trade environment.

2 sources
Market Trends Negative

SCOTUS Strikes Down Trump's Global Tariffs: A Major Reprieve for US Retailers

The US Supreme Court has invalidated the Trump administration's sweeping global tariffs, ruling that the executive branch overstepped its authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act. This landmark decision halts the collection of levies that had already reached $134 billion, offering immediate relief to the retail and e-commerce sectors.

2 sources
Market Trends Negative

Trump Pivots to Section 122 for 10% Global Tariff After Supreme Court Defeat

Following a landmark 6-3 Supreme Court ruling striking down the use of emergency powers for broad import duties, President Trump has invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a 10% global tariff. The move shifts the legal basis for his protectionist agenda while temporarily lowering rates for some partners like India from previously negotiated levels.

2 sources
Market Trends Neutral

Supreme Court Voids IEEPA Tariffs: Retailers Brace for $175B Refund Battle

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 6-3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not grant the President authority to impose tariffs, invalidating billions in duties. This landmark decision opens a complex legal battle for an estimated $175 billion in refunds, impacting retailers and e-commerce platforms nationwide.

2 sources

International Emergency Economic Powers Act is linked from 5 stories on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.